The Infamous Ink

May 31, 2008

What Matters?

Filed under: Ecology, International, Climate Crisis — Ginger @ 1:42 am
Readers of the Nation seem to have no concept of urgency. Constitutional crises are important, but nowhere as important as climate change. They seem to disagree, according to this poll:

http://www.thenation.com/poll/missing_issue08

Right now climate change ranks dead last among the issues they feel the candidates are not devoting enough time to.

Get your priorities straight, people! The environment should be number 1 far and away. Progressives who critique conservatives on climate change need to take a long, hard look in the mirror. Nobody is paying enough attention to this.

The problem is that liberals think that gay marriage rights, abortion, and public works are more important issues than the climate crisis.

Let’s get real, here. The solutions that we’ve come up with are pathetic. Alternative fuels are only a very short-term (and ineffective) answer to the problem. We simply need to consume far less energy.

Less.

Energy.

The first presidential candidate who has the nuts to out right tell America and the world that we need to use less energy, and comes up with a real approach will get my vote.

May 22, 2008

No One at the New Yorker has an Anus

I read the New Yorker less frequently than I used to. I had to admit at a certain point that I didn’t understand half of what they write about, and their fiction section is as thrilling as moon pie on a paper plate. Occasionally they still write something that grabs my attention and today yielded this article on the so-called paradox of free trade:

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2008/05/26/080526ta_talk_surowiecki

The author plays into an age old fallacy of believing that political candidates (in this case, Clinton and Obama,) actually plan to follow through on the promises they make during the campaign. They compare the primary contest to a “who hates free trade more” competition and then chastise the Democratic candidates for not understanding the “paradox” that free trade represents.

That paradox: raising tarriffs on China to help middle Americans will eventually hurt middle and lower class Americans because it will effect their buying power. Buying power that is used to by cheap clothes and shoes made by Chinese children who earn less than a dollar an hour in a sweatshop.

Sweatshop

The logic is the same that has brought us the (Still waiting for my) economic stimulus package. Ordinary Americans will quickly spend the money that is being sent to them, and thus will help the economy. If you read between the lines, the administration is saying that poor people are stupid and will give the money right back to us by purchasing useless shit.

I may benefit from cheap goods made in China. In fact, I’m wearing a pretty cheap button-up shirt right now that was made there. But you know what I would benefit from EVEN MORE? A real job that pays well, is protected from outsourcing, and has the backing of a union. Then maybe, just maybe, I could afford to stop buying cheap goods that don’t last very long, and enjoy the luxuries of travel and education like the wealthy.

The anusless masses who subscribe to the New Yorker and the National Review should be smart enough (because of all that expensive education) to understand that lower and middle class Americans wouldn’t make such supposedly stupid buying decisions if they could actually afford to make good ones.

Obama has played the populist card as well as anyone, while nobody (except the middle class people who refuse to vote for him) seems to notice that he thinks free trade is the greatest thing since the wheel. It says so on his website.

Meanwhile, nobody was more responsible for the unleashing of free trade than Bill Clinton. Is it not painfully obvious to anyone that the Democratic party doesn’t give a fourth of a flying fig about average Americans’ interests? (Which is still twice as much as Republicans)

Don’t buy the hype. The benefits of free trade for average Americans (and Chinese) are far outweighed by the costs.

May 20, 2008

Daniel Larison: On the Necessity of an Irrational Enemy

Filed under: Uncategorized — Infamous Ink @ 7:30 pm

One of the most important things to understand about the authorized use of torture by agents of the United States government is how closely it is tied to the portrayal of the enemy as utterly irrational.

read more | digg story

May 18, 2008

Dan Rather @ Columbia

While I’m still a little disappointed that the other half of my graduating class gets to have Earth, Wind, and Fire perform at their commencement, I was honored yesterday to hear Dan Rather speak at my graduation ceremony.

Rather spoke, as he often does, of courage. He was speaking not only to those of us who had chosen journalism as their field, but to any of us who used writing. He encouraged us to challenge those who are in power, to not be intimidated by its instruments. Rather did not indulge the simple cliche of saying we are the future; instead, he told us that we are the now; he warned us not to wait to follow our dreams and to change the world and make it in the image that we want it.

These are words that I try to take to heart whenever I sit down to write, whether it be political commentary, diary, or fictional stories. Courage and the willingness to challenge the conventions of society are important. Rather reminded us that democracy is not the sole responsibility of people in Washington or the state legislature: it is on all of us to preserve it.

Journalists are not the only people who must hold those in power accountable. With the growth of the internet, it is now possible for people to understand the world in a limitless number of ways: the barriers to information and freedom are being torn down as we speak, but we must not forget to exercise that right and keep the powers that be in check.

I ask that if you’re voting for John Mccain, you question his policies, and you hold him accountable to the Constitution. I ask that if you’re voting for Obama, you force him to uphold the oath of office. No matter who you choose to elect, I ask that you never stop questioning them. Had we maintained our courage and been more willing to challenge our current President, we would not be in the shape we are in now.

In America, we the people are in charge.

P.S. Congratulations to everyone from the class of 2008

May 15, 2008

Edwards gives long-awaited endorsement to Obama

Filed under: Uncategorized — Infamous Ink @ 8:12 pm

DEARBORN, Mich. - Democrat John Edwards has given his long-awaited endorsement to Barack Obama. It’s a major boost from a former presidential rival as Obama tries to shrug off Hillary Rodham Clinton, who is determined to press ahead.

read more | digg story

May 14, 2008

BREAKING NEWS: John Edwards endorses Barack Obama

Filed under: Uncategorized — Infamous Ink @ 11:29 pm

Democrat John Edwards has given his long-awaited endorsement to Barack Obama. It’s a major boost from a former presidential rival as Obama tries to shrug off Hillary Rodham Clinton, who is determined to press ahead.


read more | digg story

May 13, 2008

Teacher fired for refusing to sign loyalty oath

Filed under: Uncategorized — Infamous Ink @ 12:07 am

Cal State system ousts another instructor who objects on religious grounds to a pledge adopted by California in 1952 to root out communists.

This is pretty terrifying!

read more | digg story

May 12, 2008

Myanmar

Filed under: Ecology, International, Aid — Ginger @ 5:10 pm
Occasionally we get drunk and yell about politics on the weekends here. I was drunk enough to advocate the slaughter of the wealthy elite in this country (the kind of people that fix elections.) Andy said it was unAmerican and barbaric, which it would be. I retorted that the guys in smoking jackets who really run America are evil and deserve it.
He asked if we were evil like the government of Myanmar. I had to say no. The junta leadership is not allowing aid into the country in the wake of a devastating cyclone that has claimed the lives of over 30,000 people and that is a very conservative number at this point. This is petty dictatorship. There is no excuse for this kind of wanton negligence.Because foreign aid is being blocked, the dead are not being collected. The diseases that will be caused from this could be far more deadly than the storm itself in the long run.
The military leadership of Myanmar is either undeniably wicked, or REALLY has something to hide. Or both, perhaps.Here is a link where you can donate to Unicef’s fund for the victims:
http://www.google.com/myanmarcyclone/

Pray that it actually gets to people that need it.

May 11, 2008

The Very Near Future

Filed under: Uncategorized — Ginger @ 3:59 am

http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2008/05/09/war-with-iran-might-be-closer-than-you-think/

Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran. Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran! Bomb Iraaaaaaaaaaaaaan! Fast as you caaaaaaaaaaan! Bomb Iraaaaaan! Cuz just Iraq ain’t enough for the crazies, Bomb Iran.

Seriously though. Don’t bomb Iran.

May 8, 2008

A Progressive Realists’ Perspective on Iraq; 5 years later

Filed under: International, Digg.com, Gulf War II — Infamous Ink @ 7:21 pm

As a future policymaker I can tell you what I’ve learned from the Gulf War II and that is: Do not enter a war without a comprehensive strategy that is agreed upon by one’s staffers/cabinet, colleagues and has, at the very least, received a candid nod from other states within the international system.  The fact remains that the U.S. moved in an almost unilateral direction when it invaded Iraq and, since the invasion, has done very little to ensure the safety of Iraqis (regardless of their ethnicity) and has done even less to ensure that social capital and infrastructure systems continue to function.  What must be noted is that Iraq is not West Germany, one of our greatest state building success stories nor is it Nicaragua, one of our worst; Iraq is a beast of an entirely different nature and the need for it to be different than the state building attempts of the 20th century is imperative to American national security and both global and regional stability.

     It was a bad move to enter Iraq, period; and, now we are stuck there.  The Bush administration got us, the people, into this tangle without a plan (I believe that is called being a “Hawk’) and has bungled the operation every step of the way.  Future policymakers need to remember Iraq (much like Vietnam or WW I) as war that was started over the private interests of only a handful of elites and that that is no reason to provoke a shooting war.  I also think future policymakers need to acknowledge the roll of pure arrogance in this conflict; that is, America thought it was invincible and that it had a moral claim to spreading democracy to the region.  I don’t believe that the Pentagon or the Bush administration thought for one second that the war would last this long or be this bloody; I believe they honestly thought American military technologies and training would allow for a swift and rather bloodless victory.

     Future policymakers also need to remember that the American people are hard to mobilize for international conflict and that they don’t tolerate long drawn out wars in which no end is ever in sight.  War weariness is a very real thing and it is demoralizing to our troops who, in most cases, already do not want to be in a foreign country fighting.  Future policymakers need to learn how to, in addition to constantly reevaluating strategy and ground conditions, act with prudence to ensure that we are at war for the “right” reasons because, as much as we are told by the White House that the current Gulf War is over democratization and stability most Americans and service people are too jaded to believe it, that is, most everyone knows the war is about Western control of Arab oil fields and not liberating the oppressed Iraqi citizenry.

     As much as it is a domestic and policy issue it is also a resource and logistics issue.  American troops, prior to entering the war, were not properly equipped or trained militarily for urban, desert warfare or the ensuing cultural clash.  To prove that it isn’t just rhetoric, the first American troops to Iraq in 2003 were there without body armor, armored vehicles, translators, night vision, real time intelligence, adequate ammunition, munitions protections (i.e. devices to keep sand out of their M-16s), etc… etc… etc… These are facts that the State Department and the DoD admit and our veterans share with a rather “well shucks!” attitude.  Future policymakers should learn from Iraq that wars are not won with through planes and Halliburton-KBR but through control and security on the ground.  You cannot send farm boys from Kansas or inner city youth from Pittsburgh to a foreign country without all of the war-making resources our nation has at its disposal, it is setting them up for failure and the American public for a long, heartbreaking conflict that divides the nation.

     As an aside, I objected to war in the beginning and continue to disagree with the way it is being managed right now.  Five years after the fact America’s service people on the ground in Basra or the devastated south of the country are fighting with a sporadic supply munitions, Kevlar jackets, clean water and food, and good medical care.  In addition to their needs going un-met they are forced to work alongside private contractors who do not answer to anyone and have totally different ROEs.  My friends who are Marines have told me it is the contractors like BlackWater and Aegis that are making their jobs tough because they kill without discretion and do not have to answer to Lieutenants or Sergeants on the ground.  This war has been mismanaged and, I hope, future policymakers realize this and not repeat the mistakes of the previous generation; and that is what blows my mind, Bush and his generation are the Vietnam generation and they have made almost all of the same mistakes the Johnson administration made in Vietnam sans a draft…

Next Page »

Powered by WordPress

Cialis
Cialis Order
Online Cialis
Cialis 20mg
Cialis Price
Cialis Soft
Buy Cialis Online
Cialis Soft Tab
Cialis For Sale
Order Cialis Online
Buy Cheap Cialis
Cialis Online Pharmacy
Cheapest Cialis
Cialis Online
Buying Cialis
Cialis On Line
Cialis 20
Cialis Pill
Cialis Tablet
Cialis Pills
Order Cialis
Cialis Cost
What Is Cialis
Cialis 20 Mg
Cheap Cialis Online
Discount Cialis
Buy Cialis
Cialis On Line
Cialis Prices
Cialis Buy
Soft Cialis
Canada Cialis
Purchase Cialis
Cialis Cheap

Ultram Tramadol
Online Tramadol
Prescription Tramadol
Tramadol Side Effects
Buy Tramadol
Tramadol
Tramadol Hydrochloride
Order Tramadol
Cheap Tramadol
Tramadol Cheap
Tramadol Drug
Discount Tramadol
Tramadol Side
Tramadol Online
Buy Tramadol Online
Tramadol Hcl
Tramadol Prescription
What Is Tramadol
Tramadol